TT
TETRA TECH INC (TTEK)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q2 FY25 net revenue and adjusted EPS exceeded consensus and company guidance: Net revenue $1.104B vs S&P Global consensus ~$1.042B*, and adjusted EPS $0.33 vs ~$0.31*; GAAP EPS was $0.02 due to a $92.4M non‑cash goodwill impairment tied to USAID program terminations .
- TTEK raised FY25 guidance: net revenue to $4.400–$4.765B (from $4.365–$4.765B) and adjusted EPS to $1.42–$1.52 (from $1.37–$1.52). Q3 net revenue guided to $1.10–$1.20B and EPS to $0.35–$0.40 .
- Resilience despite abrupt USAID/DOS impact: backlog adjusted to $4.31B total after ~$1.1B de‑obligation, with core backlog ex‑USAID/State at $4.09B and book‑to‑bill of ~1.1x (ex‑USAID/State) .
- Capital allocation and liquidity strengthened: $150M buyback in Q2; new $500M authorization ($673M total available); quarterly dividend raised to $0.065; and a new $1.5B credit facility ($600M revolver; $250M 3‑yr TL; $250M 5‑yr TL) with covenants (max leverage 3.5x; min interest coverage 3.0x) .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
- What Went Well
- Broad-based demand offset USAID/DOS headwinds; state & local net revenue grew 44% YoY (about half disaster response, balance ongoing municipal water up 19% YoY); U.S. federal ex‑USAID/State up 16% YoY; GSG revenue +12% YoY to $521M with 13.8% margin despite non‑reimbursable closeout costs .
- CIG margin 13.2%; U.S. commercial up 5% YoY; UK/Irish water programs double‑digit growth; strong DoD/USACE pipeline with >$30B federal contract capacity and multiple recent wins supporting growth visibility .
- Digital systems/AI strategy advancing: signed definitive agreement to acquire SAGE Group (800 automation experts) to expand AI‑enabled digital automation; management targets a $500M digital systems practice by 2030 .
- What Went Wrong
- USAID/DOS terminations triggered a $92.4M non‑cash goodwill impairment and backlog de‑obligation of ~$1.1B; GAAP EPS reduced to $0.02 in Q2 .
- International growth mixed; Australia infrastructure work down >10% (election‑driven pausing), and clients paused some international commercial decisions awaiting tariff clarity .
- USAID closeout created non‑reimbursable costs and temporary utilization pressure in the affected group; management held staff during the transition to redeploy, modestly weighing margins in the short term .
Financial Results
Results vs S&P Global consensus (Q2 FY25):
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Segment performance (Q2 FY25):
KPIs and balance sheet:
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “Never have we seen our largest client by revenue essentially disappear within just 1 quarter… [yet] we had one of the best quarters in the company’s history” — Dan Batrack, citing record Q2 revenue/net revenue, higher segment margins, and strong seasonally slow quarter performance .
- “Our USAID client has paid… over $150 million which equates to about a 10‑day DSO improvement… trailing‑12‑month CFO $311M; net leverage ~1.36x at Q2, improving to ~1.1x post‑collections” — CFO Steve Burdick .
- “Without USAID… the underlying business has about a 50 bps increase [in baseline margin]… margins should grow slightly faster than the 50 bps [annual]” — Dan Batrack .
- “$5B in new DoD contract capacity this fiscal year… with coverage across Middle East, Pacific, Americas and civil works” — Leslie Shoemaker .
- “Data centers are a fastest growth market… tracking ~$120M in FY25 revenue (+20% YoY) with 20–25% growth expected in coming years; SAGE adds global digital automation capability” — Joseph Fong .
Q&A Highlights
- State & local funding sensitivity: Management does not see near‑term pressure despite potential federal budget changes; many projects are multi‑year and backed by bonds/user fees in large states (FL/TX/CA) .
- EPA deregulation risk/opportunity: Majority of environmental work is state/local; PFAS regulation and remediation (incl. DoD sites) is a positive opportunity; limited direct impact expected from proposed federal changes .
- Margins post‑USAID: Baseline company margin higher without USAID; management expects margin expansion above prior 50 bps annual trajectory .
- USAID burn‑down: ~$220M remaining (mostly Ukraine) expected roughly ~$100M in Q3 and ~$100M in Q4, subject to volatility; task orders already issued .
- International uncertainty: Some clients delaying decisions pending tariff clarity; UK/Irish water strong; Australia infra softness during election period .
Estimates Context
- Q2 FY25 beat S&P Global consensus on both net revenue (~$1.104B vs
$1.042B*) and Primary/adjusted EPS ($0.33 vs ~$0.31*). GAAP EPS was $0.02 due to the USAID‑related impairment .
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Where estimates may adjust:
- Street likely raises FY25 net revenue/EPS lower bounds after guidance increase and Q2 beat; model assumptions updated for: intangible amortization (~$35M FY), tax (27.5%), D&A ($24M), interest ($34–$38M), and share count (~267M) .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Core demand is resilient and diversified: strong state & local, DoD/USACE, U.S. commercial, and UK/Irish water offset USAID/DOS exit; ex‑USAID backlog/bookings remain solid .
- Margin trajectory improves post‑USAID: baseline uplift and continued annual expansion expected, aided by mix (water, disaster response, digital) .
- Digital/AI optionality: SAGE accelerates high‑margin digital automation; management targets a sizable digital systems business by 2030 .
- Capital deployment supports EPS: $150M Q2 buyback, $500M new authorization, dividend up 12% YoY, and ample $1.5B credit capacity at favorable terms .
- Near‑term model sensitivities: USAID Ukraine burn‑down timing; disaster response cadence; Australia recovery; tariff clarity on international commercial projects .
- Medium‑term thesis: Structural tailwinds in water security, environmental remediation (incl. PFAS), resilient infrastructure, and data center water/energy solutions underpin multi‑year growth .
Notes: All company results and guidance reflect press releases and call commentary. Estimates marked with an asterisk (*) are values retrieved from S&P Global. Citations: earnings PR [32], 8‑K and credit facility/dividend [33], Q2 call [28], prior quarter PRs [57] [60], subsequent Q3 PR [22].